Dear
TCAN supporter!
The TCAN board of directors has four problems.
- A problem
in following procedures established by the board itself.
- A problem
with the absence of knowledge based decision making for important
decisions.
- A problem
with understanding the concept of the relationship between a Board
and an organization’s chief executive.
- The most
Important problem is that the TCAN board seems to believe that
it is responsible to no one, that their decisions are the sole
business of the board and the public and more specifically, the
membership.
Examples of a failure to apply the principles of due diligence
to important decisions:
- A decision
to approve an architectural plan that would have placed all of
the bathrooms upstairs in place of our gallery area outside of
the main hall. This decision, which as you may know was subsequently
rescinded, was taken without fully considering the best and highest
use of space. The decision was made unilaterally and without consideration
for my views on the matter during the decision process as the
individual most familiar with the operation.
- A recent
vote to change our name to “The Center for Arts” and
getting rid of “TCAN” and natickarts.org. The concern
was a too close identification with the town of Natick. Had the
proponents tried a web search on the new name, conducted research
into the cost to TCAN in terms of identity loss, constituent confusion,
lost visibility, and operational cost to implement then presented
their findings objectively, it would never have even so much as
come to a vote. With a complex organization that runs 380 events
a year as well as a full time teaching program, any such change
requires very careful assessment.
- The fundraiser
fiasco (The TCAN board decided to hire a Director of Development
at an exorbitant rate without a thorough search and without advertising
for the position publicly) is an excellent example of the failure
of the BOD to follow process, engage in knowledge based decision-making
and to allow the CEO to do his job.
Following
the organizations own internal processes is of critical importance.
TCAN's hiring policies ensure accountability and provide protection
to both employees and BOD members. These policies were approved
by the Board in February, 2003
These policies
are intended to provide protection both to the employees of TCAN
as well as Board members to ensure adherence to related labor laws,
to make sure hiring and compensation policies are carried out in
a moral, fiscally responsible and equitable manner.
The recent board
appointment in question bypassed all the board established processes
notably that:
- The Executive
Director is to have the hiring authority over all associates
- All open
positions must be posted openly for the benefit both of employees,
volunteers and external candidates who may wish to apply.
- All permanent
positions are required to report to the Executive Director.
- The position
was not benchmarked against similar positions in eastern Massachusetts
to ensure that salary ranges are competitive without being excessive.
On this basis, the compensation package offered to the Director
of Development is excessive, and worse, not tied to results.
Employment and
compensation decisions also affect the morale of employees. High
morale is critical to TCAN which relies on the ambassadorship of
employees' in their constant interaction with the community at large
to foster community involvement,
TCAN employees
are key contributors to our success by securing and maintaining
the volunteer workforce to staff events, maintain the facility and
infrastructure, conduct membership and other drives, and assist
with special projects.
High morale
among TCAN employees is a key contributor to the success of arts
events as well, affecting attendance as well as financial support.
TCAN employees and volunteers encourage neighbors and friends to
donate money and time, attend concerts, and "spread the message".
The
board must come to realize that the most educated operational decisions
are made close to the performance stage, gallery or classroom floor....not
the boardroom.
The board must come to understand:
- TCAN leaders
are accountable to the community for their actions.
- TCAN's roots
are in community activism and involvement. Natick and the surrounding
communities feel personally vested in the success of TCAN, as
evidenced by the vibrant and diverse volunteer base and membership
demographics.
- Decisions
relative to TCAN operation and future will ultimately be tried
in the court of public opinion. Citizens must believe that TCAN
leaders act in their best interest. The press must believe that
TCAN holds itself and others to a high standard of conduct. Both
are critical to the enduring good will of the public, and its
continued financial support.
George Fiske
is right about one thing when he said "We had come to the conclusion
that we were not able to function the way we should." However,
following the organizations own policies, procedures and guidelines
along with operating responsibly would silence my ongoing moral,
fiscal and other concerns simultaneously correcting the lions's
share of differences we have in "operating style".
Finally, I have
led this organization from NOTHING to something pretty spectacular.
NEVER have I received any indication that I was not performing up
to standard. It is interesting the board under the leadership of
George Fiske chooses now to decide that I have not been doing my
job. However, I think, and hope you agree, that any such assertion
in the light of the results we have achieved together, is frankly
ludicrous.
I look forward
to your thoughts and suggestions about how we can work together
to require that TCAN leadership remains faithful to its founding
principles and the members who support them.
Sincerely
Michael D. Moran
|